Discourse 29: Auribus Tenere Lupum

The Hubris of Weaponized Migration

The elite play dangerous games, never shy to grab the wolf by the ears. Without risk to themselves, even catastrophic consequences do not deter them from grabbing, twisting and then letting go, for they have already secured their own preservation. It becomes our children who are proffered for sacrifice to their agendas. It becomes our families, our communities, our cultures, our nations, all are offered as collateral for their desires. This has been the story of history.

Our blood has always been the fuel for their hubris.

It is true that diversity can be a strength, a form of hybrid vigor that provides anti-fragility to a system, including civilizations. Although anti-fragile diversity in human systems requires a core element of cohesion centered around a shared ethos. Otherwise, the diversity is mere randomness and increases system fragility. While differences can be a strength centered around an epicenter, different is not.

This is not epistemic manipulation, but the lifting of its veil.

Organic geographic multiculturalism is like a set of gears that have been meticulously adapted to fit together in concert with others. However, the individual components remain unchanged fundamentally, like a catalyst that produces a higher level multi-cultural civilization with drastically reduced friction. This natural and voluntary process as witnessed throughout history takes time and the passing of numerous generations. The velocity of such metamorphosis is slow and nonlinear. Although, there are more examples of cultures being assimilated entirely or outright destroyed than there are of stable multi-cultural geographic centers, but it is possible.

(I have much to unpack here in a small space)

It is undeniable that the industrial revolutions have terraformed every organic human culture on the planet. One can argue it was natural progress. Others will say it has destroyed much of what made us human, the authentic element of our being.

They would both be correct.

Humans are indeed unique.

We can build or destroy. Sometimes what we build can destroy us, in fact it always does. Every technology we have developed as a species has altered our social dynamics, our structures, our rituals, our culture- all modified with each new addition. Each time we adapt to the new environment, similar but changed. The speed of the evolutionary process of technology has historically been slow, allowing time for cultural adaptation.

The quickening pace of technology over the past century and a half has untethered culture from the authentic human element. Without the time to organically adapt, the technology of culture was seized by those who produce the technology. This is part of the occult technology of power.

Now couple that with the ostensible reasons for global community-

For those enlightened few who agree with the American foundational ethos of Liberty- they saw a global world set free of tyranny, not through coercion, but by choice.

All Humans should be free.

There is no “other”.

(It is true that our Dunbar limits make us tribal, it serves a purpose. Natural law is complex. This has been hijacked by social engineers.)

This should be the desire of all who profess to support individual liberty or the love of Christ.

Although, the same noble ideas of our founding had their rhetoric hijacked, manifesting in open society circles of the global elite. This did not just happen either, the march of god through the world has been centuries in the making and allegedly ends with its liberal democracy. However, It is now being crucified and will be resurrected in some form of fresh hell. Digital technocracy? Neoliberal feudalism? Either way it is predictable once you see what was done. Trump or any other manufactured hero is not coming to save anyone from this outcome, he is carrying the torch for the global transformation.

Even though the rhetoric of liberty has been subverted through epistemic warfare, the ideas of a truly free world still burn in the hearts of many men because it is our natural state. This ethos grows from an everlasting seed as old as time itself. We could have a free multicultural world in time…

Although, this does not mean this is realistic at present. It is difficult enough when the culture is organically shaped, it is an entirely different phenomenon when multiculturalism has been forced upon our social structures via weaponized migration in a short period of time. This is the wolf the elite have once again found themselves dancing with against its will. (Not a new strategy at all but absent most history books) They have fomented wars, plaques, droughts… to create refuges to usher them to geographically and culturally distinct places.

It is through this manipulation of human geography that weaponized empathy has been used to disarm classic liberals. Before they were institutionalized, borders were a form of cultural demarcation, open borders in the ideal case would mean we have transcended the need- via organic multiculturalism- where one location is a distinction without a difference regarding liberty. But we do not live in an ideal world. Borders are no longer cultural. They are institutional and technocratic. The nation-state incentive structure is entirely artificial. Open borders in a forced multicultural world of weaponized migration is not a sign of transcendence, but of cultural suicide.

Clearly the elite knew this was the catastrophic outcome before they decided to “Auribus tenere lumpum”. They wanted this- which means it was an act of war. That much of the “great replacement” theory is certainly true.

For why? That is a different discussion. Nor do I claim to know exactly.

For this brief discourse, I am focusing on the action of cultural suicide and its second order effects that I think (know) they wanted as well.

From the perspective of tactics, it was known they could not hope to contain the consequences of killing western culture through this ritualistic suicide. The consequences of blowback.

This antagonistic energy they anticipated has been recuperated into an almost crusade level psychology directed at migrants based off of racial lines. The blame for the social discohesion and cultural Kevorkian signs has been directed away from the state and into the domestic population. (illegal or otherwise) Consequently and predictably, populations have started galvanizing around nationalistic epistemology. They want this for the reset.

Normally, people who are so disparate would not be members of the same nation, let alone community in the traditional sense. But these are not organic communities that have come together based on shared values where people migrate towards each other for that reason. Instead, we have manufactured atomized geographic areas where people live in networks instead of a community with shared culture. The only common thread being we are all part of the same drone culture. Preexisting organic communities of like culture are targeted and destroyed by migrant influx.

They are using our energy against us by creating a mess we would undoubtedly react to. There are many profiles on Substack turning this into a race and culture war primarily by leaning on a kernel of truth easily observed in this artificial environment.

We are in fact, not all the same. To that end I agree there are major intercultural issues beyond the general cultural decline experienced globally. There are some very incompatible standards and mores that range from being a mere nuisance to being intolerable. However, all of that requires nuance to discuss or one risks overgeneralizing which leads one to collective group thinking. They are all X, we are all Y. To make matters worse, schismogenesis is actively promoted. This is all intentional. We were not all meant to live together in close proximity, but in peace at a distance unless natural multiculturalism emerged – which is a process that cannot be forced because that leads to destruction.

Of course, some of the Stacks that are promoting this are not merely doing so because they can observe the aforementioned- but because they are assisting with the agenda. –

Asking the same power apparatus- giving the same power apparatus- that weaponized migration to begin with- the ability to deport everyone based off of race (or ideology such as with Mahmoud Khalil) so we can have an ethnocentric demographic with the ersatz hope of regaining monoculture is a terrible idea. Clearly there would be a significant cost of human suffering as this is how atrocities are born. So, while my primary issue is both moral and ethical, it is a tactical mistake… unless your real objective is to increase the power of the state. Which is what I suspect this was always about. The power elite want us to beg for the solution it has waiting.

With all that said, I do think there are cultures that are better at slaying dragons and civilizing man as well as there being cultures that are undesirable. However, I do not want to fall for this trap. We need to break this cycle and the wheel.

The age of shadow empires needs to end, and it can if more people start noticing the real problem.

Let us first turn towards the state and fight Sauron, then we can liberate the Shire from the scouring.

Until then we are playing by their rules in their game.

After all, Christ already gave us the blueprint.

The Christian Remedy for Schismogenesis

How Jesus’ λόγος Restores C. Wright Mills' American Public